Methodology Sample
Jason B. Cannon
Comm5080
Dr. John S. Gossett
28 November 2001
Problematic for First Amendment analysis in the communication
discipline is the lack of a methodological instrument specifically designed to
analyze concerns for First Amendment scholars and students. Nevertheless, this
project will explain the methodological approach to understanding the
implications of the USA Patriot Act of 2001 in relation to online free speech
and online privacy concerns using the Burkean cluster analysis. The cluster
analysis attempts to understand the motive(s) of an artifact. The application of
the cluster analysis will identify motive(s) within the Patriot Act through the
definition of key terms and the concepts, which exist around them. Assumptions
of this type of criticism suggest that motive or effect is driven, either
implicitly or explicitly, through the definition or framing of key components of
an artifact. The question posed in this project, "to what extent does the
USA Patriot Act of 2001 infringe on the free speech and privacy rights of online
citizens?" will be answered using the methodology detailed in this
component of the research project. The intent of this project will attempt to
group or cluster similar concepts of free speech and privacy, as proposed by
free speech theorists Alexander Meiklejohn, Franklyn Haiman and Zechariah
Chaffee, together and compare or contrast them with similar notions gleaned from
the implications of the Patriot Act of 2001. The outcome of this analysis will
demonstrate the invasive techniques employed by the United States federal
government go far beyond the constitutional bounds of previous free speech
precedents in order to disrupt, impede, discover or limit the communication of
known or suspected terrorists.
The first step in understanding the implications stated above, will be to download a copy of the Patriot Act from the Library of Congress website. This will allow other First Amendment scholars and students to reference the work easily and refer quickly to sections mentioned in the project more efficiently through the use of the official Library of Congress text and its pagination.
The next step in this process will be to define the terms and
concepts to be discussed in the paper. Free speech concepts and ideologies from
Franklin Haiman, Zechariah Chaffee, Thomas Emerson, and Alexander Meiklejohn
will be offered as a basis for understanding the fundamental importance of
public and private speech. Furthermore, the Burkean process of cluster analysis
will be explained and its application to the artifact will also be included in
order to familiarize the reader with the mechanism.
The cluster analysis consists of four elements. First, this
researcher will identify key terms of significant interest for First Amendment
theorists within the text of the Patriot Act. These key terms will serve as the
nexus for other terms, which exist in close proximity, conceptually, to the
identified key terms. Next, these terms will be charted to create clusters of
concepts, which will serve as a basis to explain and explore these concepts in
relation to First Amendment theory. From these clusters of terms, patterns will
be defined which serve to further define the meanings of the key terms. This
step is critical in the cluster analysis. Through the identification of
patterns, this researcher will demonstrate whether or not the language of the
Patriot Act seeks to subvert or reify fundamental free speech theories. Finally,
this project will name the motive of the artifact. The intent is to discover the
motive of the Patriot Act and its implications for free speech, not the
legislative intent. The delineation of legislative intent and application of the
act will be discussed to further show the overbreadth of the act.
Through the cluster analysis the motive(s) and definitions will be further explored to determine if they exist in direct conflict with the free speech concepts of Emerson, Haiman, Chaffee, and Meiklejohn. Furthermore, the study will discuss the findings of the cluster analysis and the implications that the language of the act and the concepts advanced will present for First Amendment scholars.